DOJ’s focus on individual accountability is particularly important with respect to telemedicine. Telemedicine is a burgeoning field, with a projected market increase of 18% annually over the next six years, reaching $103 billion in 2024. In light of this recent surge in profitability, DOJ has begun paying extra attention to telemedicine, with at least one recent HHS-OIG report asserting that more than one-third of all telemedicine claims are improper.
DOJ’s Enforcement Activity Against Individuals: Acute Focus on Telemedicine
Posted In Benefit Controversies, Health and Welfare Plans
Tags: California, compliance programs, Department of Justice, DME companies, DOJ, durable medical equipment companies, FCA, Florida, health care, health care fraud, HHS-OIG, Medicare, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, telemedicine, telemedicine claims, telemedicine companies, telemedicine prosecutions, Texas, United States
Amandeep S. SidhuAmandeep (Aman) S. Sidhu focuses his practice on complex commercial disputes with an emphasis on regulated industries, including health care-related investigations and litigation. He represents hospitals and health care companies in investigations and defense of qui tam whistleblower litigation involving federal False Claims Act (FCA), Stark Laws and Anti-Kickback Statute in federal district courts throughout the United States. Aman regularly supports settlement negotiations with the US Department of Justice for clients in multiple jurisdictions, including negotiation of corporate integrity agreements with the US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General. Aman also represents health care and life sciences companies in the navigation of state and federal investigations, including responding to congressional inquiries. Aman serves on the Firm's Diversity/Inclusion Committee, Pro Bono and Community Service Committee and Associate Development Committee. Read Amandeep Sidhu's full bio.
James A. Cannatti IIIJames A. Cannatti III practices at the intersection of today’s most pertinent healthcare issues, including in the areas of digital health, health IT policy, and the fraud and abuse laws. He counsels healthcare providers, health information technology companies, and other healthcare and life sciences organizations on matters ranging from Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law and EKRA compliance to information blocking and interoperability. With more than a decade spent in the Office of Inspector General (OIG) at the US Department of Health and Human Services, and the wealth of experience gained from serving as OIG’s Senior Counselor for Health Information Technology, James is well-attuned to the regulatory issues impacting the rapidly evolving healthcare landscape. Read James A. Cannatti III's full bio.
Theodore AlexanderTheodore (Ted) Alexander focuses his practice on general litigation matters. He has experience in Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and white-collar cases. Ted also advises clients on federal health policy. Read Theodore Alexander's full bio.
Related Posts
- Healthcare Enforcement in the Post-Pandemic Era
- States Move to Regulate Telehealth-Related Youth Services
- Enhanced Nurse Licensure Compact Eases the Practice of Nursing across State Lines
- HHS OIG Develops Toolkit to Analyze Telehealth Claims to Assess Program Integrity Risks
- Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and Drug Pricing Reform: Eligible Drugs to Know and Understanding What’s Next
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- Chicago Employees to Receive 10 Days of Paid Leave
- What Does Landmark AI Executive Order Mean for Healthcare?
- The Proposed MHPAEA Regulations: Comments on Behavioral Health Carve-Out Vendors
- California’s New Reproductive Privacy Laws Create Information-Sharing Complexities
- California Wage Law Puts ‘Band-Aids’ on Healthcare Worker Shortages
