An employer learned the full cost of ambiguity when a Connecticut federal district court agreed with an employee’s widow that the word “maximum” was ambiguous in the company’s life insurance plan, thus making the widow entitled to an additional $4 million in benefits. This decision serves as a warning for employers sponsoring insured benefits.
Tyll v. Stanley Black & Decker: When Plan Ambiguity Cost an Employer $4 Million
Elizabeth M. RoweElizabeth M. Rowe focuses her practice on complex civil litigation. She has experience with contract interpretation, negligence and assumption of risk, breaches of fiduciary duty, and burden of proof. Read Elizabeth Rowe's full bio.
Jacob MattinsonJacob M. Mattinson focuses his practice on employee benefits and matters related to 401(k), 403(b), pension, executive compensation, health care reform, and cafeteria and welfare plans. Jacob assists clients in drafting employee benefit plan documents and amendments. He represents clients in matters before the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), US Department of Labor (DOL) and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation with respect to plain qualification issues. Read Jacob Mattinson's full bio.
J. Christian NemethJ. Christian (Chris) Nemeth provides legal counsel on complex commercial litigation and government investigations, including ERISA matters, financial and banking cases, business torts and breach of contract actions. Chris is the Co-Chair of the Firm’s ERISA Litigation group and works closely with the Firm’s Employee Benefits department on all types of Litigation matters, Department of Labor investigations and similar issues. Read Chris Nemeth's full bio.
Judith WethallJudith Wethall focuses her practice on employee benefits, specifically health and welfare programs. She counsels employers, plan administrators, insurers and consultants on a wide range of ERISA compliance issues. Judith's clients include sole proprietors to Fortune 100 companies and cover a variety of industries including health care, technology, manufacturing, insurance and financial. Read Judith Wethall's full bio.
Related Posts
- How the Overturning of Roe v. Wade May Affect US Employer Benefits Plans
- Workers’ Abortion Privacy at Risk as Texas Targets Employer Aid
- Inflation and ERISA Penalties: Hand in Hand for 2022
- Health Plan Sponsor Assessed Attorneys’ Fees for Pursuing Meritless ERISA Claims against Plan Administrators
- The Biggest Benefits Rulings of 2020: Midyear Report
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- Insights and Challenges for the Executive Compensation Committee
- New California Law Requires Open Payments Notice to Patients
- Employers Seek Clarity on Reproductive Healthcare Benefits Litigation Following EEOC Commissioner Filing
- Senate Approves Resolution to End COVID-19 National Emergency Declaration
- CMS Downshifts on Expectations for Covered Healthcare Provider Staff COVID-19 Vaccination
