An employer group says the federal government erred in arguing that a Seattle benefits mandate for hotel workers doesn’t conflict with federal law. According to this Law360 article, the ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC) asked the US Supreme Court to review a US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision that backed the Seattle ordinance despite arguments from the US Department of Labor that the law doesn’t contradict the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. McDermott’s Michael B. Kimberly, Sarah P. Hogarth and Andrew C. Liazos represent ERIC.
Employer Group Urges Justices To Hear Seattle Benefits Row
Posted In Benefit Controversies, Retirement Plans
Michael B. KimberlyMichael B. Kimberly is co-chair of the Firm’s Supreme Court and Appellate Practice Group. He handles complex appeals and trial court motions with a primary focus on antitrust law, administrative law and constitutional law. Click here to read Michael B. Kimberly's full bio.
Sarah P. HogarthSarah P. Hogarth advises clients on complex litigation matters with a focus on appellate advocacy and critical motions practice. Read Sarah P. Hogarth's full bio.
Andrew LiazosAndrew C. Liazos is the global chair of McDermott’s Benefits & Compensation Practice Group and has practiced at McDermott for over 25 years. Andrew focuses his practice on compensation and benefit matters, including related securities, M&A, IPO, private equity, international and litigation matters. Clients range from Fortune 500 companies to compensation committees to individual executives in employment and severance negotiations. Read Andrew Liazos' full bio.
Related Posts
- How the Overturning of Roe v. Wade May Affect US Employer Benefits Plans
- Want to Provide Abortion Travel Benefits at Your Company? Here’s How to Protect Employees
- ESOP Litigation: Latest Trends and Questions
- ERIC Files Amicus Brief Rebutting DOL Attempt to Create New Regulations in Lawsuit
- Cryptocurrency for Employee Benefits Lawyers: What You Need to Know
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- Code § 4980D and Violations of the NQTL Analysis Requirement Under the Proposed MHPAEA Regulations
- Webinar Replay: SECURE 2.0 and the Impacts of Employer Matching for Student Loan Payments
- A Look into House Efforts on Hospital and Health Plan Price Transparency
- Texas District Court Overturns Portions of the IDR Process
- The “Meaningful Benefit” Requirement for NQTLs Under the Proposed MHPAEA Regulations
