The Supreme Court recently clarified the scope of SEC whistleblower retaliation provisions. Though the decision limits retaliation actions, employers should continue to avoid conduct that can be interpreted as retaliation under other statutes, and should find ways to encourage internal reporting.
SEC Whistleblower Update
By Paul Helms on March 13, 2018
Posted In Employment
Paul HelmsPaul Helms defends clients in government investigations, principally investigations by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and conducts internal investigations involving securities, accounting and other financial concerns. Through his work at the SEC and in private practice, Paul handled more than 40 investigations across multiple subject areas, including financial and accounting fraud, offering fraud, market manipulation, insider trading, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations and regulatory compliance. Paul has substantial experience in matters involving investment advisers, mutual funds and private funds. Read Paul Helms' full bio.
Related Posts
- Ninth Circuit En Banc Ruling Deepens Rift Over Gender-Based Pay Gaps
- 4 Things to Watch After the High Court’s Body Blow to Labor
- 2016 Proxy Season Checklist – What You Need to Know
- US Supreme Court Rules Highly Compensated Employee Is Not Exempt from Overtime
- ‘Unprecedented Interest’ in Employer-Covered Abortion Travel
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- Trump Administration Takes Steps to Enhance Healthcare Price Transparency
- One Big Beautiful Bill Act Has Compensation & Benefits Impacts for Nonprofit Health Systems
- An Update on NAIC’s Consideration of AI Model Law for Insurers
- “Big, Beautiful Bill”: Federal Tax Bill Would Restrict the Employee Retention Credit
- Enforcement of Mental Health Parity Regulations Suspended: Takeaways for Plan Sponsors and Health Insurance Issuers
