Andrew Liazos and David Fuller identify the three main areas to focus on in light of 162(m) and discuss traps for the unwary.
Tax Takes Video | Impacts on 162(m)
By Andrew Liazos and David Fuller on June 5, 2018
Posted In Employee Benefits, Executive Compensation
Andrew LiazosAndrew C. Liazos is the global chair of McDermott’s Benefits & Compensation Practice Group and has practiced at McDermott for over 25 years. Andrew focuses his practice on compensation and benefit matters, including related securities, M&A, IPO, private equity, international and litigation matters. Clients range from Fortune 500 companies to compensation committees to individual executives in employment and severance negotiations. Read Andrew Liazos' full bio.
David FullerDavid Fuller focuses his practice on matters involving employee fringe benefits, independent contractor/employee classification, payroll taxes, information reporting, corporate aircraft, supplemental unemployment compensation benefits (SUB pay), and the contingent workforce (outsourcing, PEOs, and employee leasing). His unique practice includes tax litigation on a wide range of significant FICA and tax refund matters. Read David Fuller's full bio.
Related Posts
- What Employers Need to Know About 162(m)
- Tax Reform Changes to Employee Compensation and Benefit Deductions
- Capital Perspective: An Analysis of Hot Topics in Benefits and Compensation
- Top Takeaways for Tax-Exempts from IRS Guidance on Executive Compensation
- Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017: Impact on Executive Pay of Tax-Exempt Organizations
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- GOP Calls Biden’s Medicare Plans a Tax Hike on Small Businesses
- The Bosses May Be Back in Charge (but Not as Much as They Think)
- Coverage of COVID-19 Vaccines and the End of the COVID-19 Emergency
- NLRB Attacks Non-Disparagement and Confidentiality Clauses in Employee Releases, Severance Agreements
- District Court Vacates Provisions of No Surprises Act Final Rule
