The US Supreme Court’s January ruling that stayed enforcement of the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) shot-or-test mandate may limit some employers from introducing their own vaccination, testing or mask requirements. However, in this Bloomberg Law article, McDermott Partner Michelle Strowhiro said employers might still want to consider implementing portions of the standard—so long as state and local limits let them.
After High Court Loss, OSHA Looks to Other COVID-Curbing Means
By Michelle S. Strowhiro on February 2, 2022
Michelle S. StrowhiroMichelle S. Strowhiro is an employment advisor and litigator. She provides trusted counsel to US and international companies on all aspects of employment law compliance. Michelle partners with clients to establish and maintain their strong and lawful employment policies and practices; manage their employee relationships from hire to termination; conduct workplace investigations; administer leaves and other workplace accommodations; and resolve disputes. She provides manager and employee trainings on management and sexual harassment. She regularly prepares and negotiates agreements, and advises companies on employment law issues for mergers and acquisitions. Michelle works with clients in the technology, fashion, food and restaurant, health care, sports, media and entertainment industries. Read Michelle Strowhiro's full bio.
Related Posts
- OSHA Hints at Permanent COVID-19 Standard, Withdraws Vax-or-Test ETS
- Supreme Court OKs CMS Vaccine Mandate but Blocks OSHA Rule
- Federal Vaccine Mandates Are Back in Play (For Now)
- NYC Announces Vaccine Mandate for All Employers Effective December 27, 2021
- Businesses Left in Limbo on COVID-19 Mandate
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- Code § 4980D and Violations of the NQTL Analysis Requirement Under the Proposed MHPAEA Regulations
- Webinar Replay: SECURE 2.0 and the Impacts of Employer Matching for Student Loan Payments
- A Look into House Efforts on Hospital and Health Plan Price Transparency
- Texas District Court Overturns Portions of the IDR Process
- The “Meaningful Benefit” Requirement for NQTLs Under the Proposed MHPAEA Regulations
