Employment
Subscribe to Employment's Posts

Employers Can Provide Tax-Free Disaster Assistance to Employees

by Jonathan J. Boyles, Robert C. Louthian, III and Ruth Wimer

Section 139 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) allows an employer to provide tax-free disaster relief to its employees, and the employer may take a tax deduction for these payments, if the payments constitute qualified disaster relief payments.  Given the benefits of tax-free status for qualified disaster relief payments, employers that choose to provide such payments should consider adopting an administrative system that validates such payments meet Code Section 139 requirements.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

Seminar Reminder – Myths and Misconceptions Dispelled

Thursday, October 4, 2012
8:45 a.m.: Registration and breakfast 
9.00 – 10.30 a.m.: Employment Seminar

McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP
Heron Tower
110 Bishopsgate
London EC2N 4AY
View map

To register to join the seminar, please click here.

We are pleased to invite you to attend the London Employment Group’s third breakfast seminar of 2012, at which we will consider and dispel some commonly held myths and misconceptions about UK employment law.

If you would like to attend this seminar, please click on the link above or if you have any queries, please email rsvptomcdermott@mwe.com.




read more

Quality Stores Decision Could Lead to Significant Refunds of FICA Tax

by Ira B. Mirsky, David E. Rogers and Ruth Wimer

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently held that certain dismissal payments were Supplemental Unemployment Compensation Benefits (SUB) exempt from FICA taxes—a clear split with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in line with an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling that significantly narrowed the criteria for determining whether certain separation payments qualify as SUB pay.  For employers that have made significant reductions in force payments in open years, the Quality Stores decision could lead to significant refunds of FICA tax.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

December 31 Deadline to Update Severance, Employment and Change in Control Agreements

by Jonathan J. Boyles

Agreements that require a release or other signed document from an employee before payment should be reviewed to ensure compliance with Code Section 409A guidance.  Transition relief ends on December 31, 2012, and the penalties for noncompliance can be harsh.  Employers that conducted a fulsome Code Section 409A review in 2007 and 2008 should ensure their arrangements are in compliance with new guidance.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

New Rules on Overseas Companies’ Equity Incentive Plans

by Lawrence Hu and May Lu

Stock option plans, stock appreciation rights plans, performance shares, phantom and restricted shares and other equity incentive plans may apply for registration under China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE).  In February 2012, SAFE issued a Notice on Administration of Foreign Exchange Used for Domestic Individuals’ Participation in Equity Incentive Plans for Companies Listed Overseas (known as Circular 7), which replaces the previous Circular 78.  Because there are tax advantages to employees if an equity incentive plan is registered through SAFE, Chinese employers considering or currently sponsoring equity programs should consider SAFE registration under this new guidance.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: The Supreme Court Decision

by Christopher M. Jedrey, Joel L. Michaels, Susan M. Nash, Paul W. Radensky and Eric Zimmerman

While the Supreme Court of the United States has in large part resolved questions regarding the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, participants in the health care industry should prepare for ongoing uncertainty in the manner and degree to which states will participate in the expansion of Medicaid.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

UK Employment Alert: Employee Duties / Employer Protections

by Alison Wetherfield

Employees are often the greatest assets of a business. Their departure to work for competitors (including their own fledgling businesses) can pose one of the greatest risks to the success of the business. These risks have been emphasized in two recent cases in which employers discovered the hard way (by losing) the need for careful drafting of employment contracts and practical management of the employment relationship from beginning to end.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

French Employment Agreements Should Specifically Name Switzerland in Non-Compete Clauses

by Sébastien Le Coeur and Jilali Maazouz

If a French employer wants to prohibit an employee from working for a competitor in both the European Union and Switzerland, then the employer should specifically list both jurisdictions in the non-compete portions of an employment agreement.  In employment agreements, France and many other jurisdictions limit enforcement of non-compete provisions to territories specifically named in the agreement.  Some jurisdictions allow non-compete territories to include several countries, or even entire regions, provided it is necessary for the protection of the employer’s interests.  Given these restrictions, because Switzerland is not part of the European Union, a French employer must specifically name Switzerland, and not just the European Union, as a region covered by the non-compete provisions in an employment agreement.

Unless the non-compete clauses specifically list Switzerland, the non-compete provisions will be virtually ineffective should the executive relocate there.  In addition, if an employment agreement provides for post-termination compensation, an executive could receive severance from a prior employer while working for a competitor in Switzerland.  Thus, all French employers should consider specifically listing Switzerland as a covered region in non-compete provisions in any new employment agreements and should also consider reviewing existing employment agreements to ensure Switzerland is specifically named as an included region in non-compete clauses.




read more

New EEOC Rule Significantly Increases Employer Burdens in ADEA Disparate Impact Cases

by Stephen D. Erf, Chris C. Scheithauer and Heather Egan Sussman.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently amended its regulations under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) concerning disparate impact claims.  The final rule, which became effective on April 30, 2012, is likely to impose significant administrative burdens on employers as well as increase potential litigation exposure and costs of ADEA claims.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

Top ranked chambers 2022
US leading firm 2022