Employment
Subscribe to Employment's Posts

Supreme Court Ruling on DOMA Could Lead to Refunds of Federal Taxes

by Todd A. Solomon, Ruth Wimer and Brian J. Tiemann

Employers providing benefits for employees’ same-sex spouses may want to consider the availability of federal payroll tax refunds if the Supreme Court of the United States finds Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional. Employers currently must impute income to an employee for the fair market value of benefit coverage for a non-dependent same-sex spouse. Such imputed income is subject to federal income and payroll taxes, as well as state income taxes in the majority of states.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

Webcast – DOMA and Proposition 8: Immediate Implications for Employee Benefit Plan Sponsors

July 2, 2013
11:00 am – 12:00 pm EDT

To register, click here.

As a result of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), same-sex relationships have not been recognized for any purpose under any federal law, including the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the Internal Revenue Code and COBRA.  Historically, this has created significant implications for the administration of benefit plans covering same-sex partners, including the taxation of health, dental and vision benefits and survivor benefits under retirement plans.  Employers that have extended equal benefits to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees have faced significant administrative and other challenges.  Employers that have not extended benefits to same-sex partners have struggled to understand their legal obligations.

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments on the constitutionality of DOMA and on California’s “Proposition 8,” which denies same-sex couples the right to marry in that state.  The Supreme Court is expected to issue its rulings in these cases in June.  Based on this, McDermott Will & Emery invites you to a webcast to discuss the impact of these landmark decisions on employee benefit plan sponsors and to address key considerations for employer-provided plans, including:

  • An up-to-date description of the federal taxation of health and welfare benefits
  • A summary of steps employers must take in light of the Supreme Court’s decisions
  • What benefits must employers offer to same-sex partners

McDermott Speakers
Joseph S. Adams, Partner
Todd A. Solomon, Partner
Brian J. Tiemann, Associate

For more information, please contact Carolyn Verscaj.




read more

France Allows Same-Sex Marriages

by Lionel Lesur and Lisa A. Linsky

On April 23, 2013, the French Parliament gave final approval to a bill allowing same-sex couples to get married and adopt children.  This makes France the 14th country in the world to legalize marriage between same-sex couples, and the 9th in Europe.  Law No.2013-404, approving marriages between same-sex couples, was signed into law by the French President on May 17, 2013 and published in the Official Journal on May 18, 2013. To read the full article, click here.

 




read more

Update on The Proposed European Cap on Bank Bonuses

by Katie Clark and James Noble

Following recent discussions on this topic, lawmakers in the European Parliament have now adopted legislation intended to cap the value of bonuses paid to certain bank staff.

Background

The measure forms part of the Capital Requirements Directive IV package of reforms implementing the Basel III regulatory framework, which aims to improve stability in the financial sector. The proposed reforms will apply to a range of credit institutions and investment firms.

The final text will be subject to a detailed review of the legal drafting and translation into the official EU languages, before being presented to the Council of Ministers for formal adoption later this year.

What Does This Mean for Employers?

If formally adopted, the new rules will limit the potential bonus entitlement of certain staff at credit institutions and investment firms, whether they work within the European Union (regardless of their employer’s country of origin), or abroad (if working for a European bank covered by the rules).

The rules will apply to employees whose professional activities have a material impact on their risk profile — such as senior managers, risk takers and staff performing control functions — and to other employees who receive equivalent remuneration. The European Banking Authority will develop criteria to help employers identify staff covered by the rules.

The proposals envisage that the default position for all staff covered by the rules will be a cap on annual bonus payments of 1 x salary. An institution could increase the cap to 2 x salary with shareholder approval. This would require the votes of at least 66 per cent of shareholders owning half the shares represented, or 75 per cent of votes if there is no quorum. An element of long-term deferral will also be necessary for any bonus payment exceeding 1 x salary. The European Banking Authority will, again, prepare guidelines in this regard.

It is envisaged that, once adopted, the new measures will affect bonuses paid in 2015 in relation to performance in 2014. This will clearly have a considerable impact on remuneration practice in the financial services sector, particularly given the potential effect on any bonus years that fall wholly or partly after the rules come into effect.

Employers in the United Kingdom will also eagerly await details of how, if adopted, the legislation will be implemented domestically, given the shift in emphasis from deferral to fixed remuneration that the new rules will have in practice.

What Happens Next?

The final text of the legislation will be prepared and presented to the Council of Ministers for formal adoption later this year. If approved and published before 1 July 2013, which appears likely, the rules should then be implemented into the laws of each Member State by 1 January 2014.

We will keep the situation under review and will issue a further update as it develops. Please contact your usual McDermott lawyer or Katie Clark if you would like to discuss in more detail.




read more

Employee Benefits Issues in Spin-Offs

by Joseph S. Adams and Jeffrey M. Holdvogt

In a corporate spin-off, both the existing company and the new company (spinco) must consider the implications for employees, employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.  Benefit plans and compensation arrangements can represent significant liabilities and responsibilities, and typically are expressly allocated in an employee matters agreement (EMA).  This article provides a brief summary of some of the key employee benefit plans issues to consider in a spin-off.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

Employee-Shareholder Status

by Katie Clark and Richard Cook

On October 8, 2012, George Osborne announced that the UK Government was proposing a new type of employment contract, dubbed the “employee-shareholder” contract.

The proposals were designed to allow employers to offer their employees shares in the business, at a minimum value of £2,000.  In exchange, the employee would forgo certain statutory rights including, most pertinently, unfair dismissal and the right to a redundancy payment.  The employees would receive favourable tax treatment on the disposal of the shares, up to a value of £50,000.

During the consultation process, the Government received little positive feedback on the approach, but confirmed in its consultation response that it intended to implement the proposals in any event.

On 24 April 2013, having twice rejected the Government’s proposals, the UK House of Lords accepted concessions made by the Government and voted to accept employee-shareholder status. The proposals are expected to become law in the autumn of 2013.

Details of The New Regime

Employers will now effectively be able to buy certain of their employees’ statutory rights for as little as £2,000. 

For the rights to be effectively waived, however, a number of criteria must be met:

  • Each individual must be given a written statement of the particulars of their employee-shareholder status.  This must specify the employment rights that he/she will forgo and detail the rights, restrictions and other conditions attached to the shares.
  • The individual must be given independent legal advice as to the terms and effect of entering into the scheme.  Unless independent advice is received, and the individual has been given seven days to consider the advice, the employee’s employment rights will not have been waived.
  • The employer will need to meet the reasonable cost of the legal advice, even if the offer is not taken up.

The right to claim discrimination and claims of automatically unfair dismissal, including whistleblowing, are excluded from the waiver.

What Does This Mean for Employers?

In theory, employee-shareholder status will provide more flexibility for employers in recruitment, and the potential to mitigate legal risk, by offering an up-front payment, in the form of shares, of as little as £2,000.

In practice, however, the intricacies of the offer-acceptance process are likely to mean that employees will be very well informed, making them less likely to “sell” their valuable employment rights for as little as £2,000. There is also scope for technical errors to be made in the new, more complex, process that may result in the employee receiving £2,000 but still retaining his or her statutory rights.

Nonetheless, if implemented properly, employee-shareholder contracts could be a valuable tool for employers who are looking to build flexibility into their workforce.  The question is whether employees, given the inherent value of the rights they are being asked to give up, and the risk of a fall in the value of their shares, will find the proposition an attractive one.

For further information, or for assistance in setting up an employee-shareholder arrangement, please [...]

Continue Reading




read more

Final Rule Implementing FMLA Amendments Expands Protections for Military Families and Airline Flight Crews

by Stephen D. Erf, Heather Egan Sussman and Sabrina E. Dunlap

The U.S. Department of Labor recently issued a final rule implementing new expanded rights for families of military members and veterans, and greater access to Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave for airline flight crews.  Companies should review and update their FMLA policies to account for this new rule.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

UK Employment Alert: Increase in Employment Protection Awards

by Katie Clark and Paul McGrath

The compensation limits on Tribunal awards will increase as of 1 February 2013.  The key changes are set out below.

Statutory Redundancy Pay

The maximum amount permitted for calculation of a week’s pay will rise from £430 to £450; the maximum entitlement to Statutory Redundancy Pay will therefore rise from £12,900 to £13,500.

Basic Award

The current maximum amount for a week’s pay will rise from £430 to £450; the maximum Basic Award will therefore rise from £12,900 to £13,500 (which would be awarded to an employee aged 61+ with 20+ years service).

Minimum Basic Award for Defined Dismissals

The minimum Basic Award a Tribunal can award for certain dismissals, i.e., those relating to certain employee representative, health and safety and working time cases, will rise from £5,300 to £5,500.

Maximum Compensatory Award

The maximum Compensatory Award a Tribunal can award in most cases of unfair dismissal will rise from £72,300 to £74,200.

The maximum total award for unfair dismissal (i.e. maximum unfair dismissal compensation plus maximum basic award) will therefore rise from £85,200 to £87,700.

What Does This Mean for Employers?

The changes will take effect on 1 February 2013 and will be applicable to dismissals taking effect on or after that date.

It is important for employers to note that:

  • If an employee is given notice prior to 1 February 2013, but the notice period will expire on or after 1 February 2013, the new limits set out above will apply to that dismissal.
  • If an employee is paid in lieu of notice, the effective date of termination (EDT) is the actual date, plus the amount of statutory notice applicable to the employee, i.e., one week per year of employment, up to a maximum of 12 weeks.  If the statutory notice would take the EDT to or beyond 1 February 2013, the new limits will apply (but see also our most recent employment alert How to Terminate Employment and Exercise a Payment in Lieu of Notice Clause).

Employers’ exposure in the event of an unfair dismissal claim will rise and should be factored into decision making regarding litigation or settlement strategies.




read more

New Regulations Pave The Way for Increased Employee Owned Companies

by Hugh Nineham and Tara Walsh

The UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) published on 4 July 2012 the final report from the Nuttall Review of Employee Ownership (the Nuttall Review).  It identifies a number of barriers to the creation and uptake of employee ownership arrangements.  The Nuttall Review identified significant economic and social benefits in employee ownership, which the UK Government has endorsed.

As a result, the UK Government has published new regulations to deregulate the current share buyback regime, which are to take effect later this year and intend to simplify the current overly burdensome rules.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

Demystifying Roth 401(k): Old and New Rules and New Opportunities

Tuesday, April 9, 2013
12:30 pm – 1:30 pm EDT

To register, please click here.

Recent legislation that expands the availability of in-plan Roth conversions has reinvigorated 401(k) plan sponsors’ interest in adopting or expanding a Roth 401(k) feature.  Even before the new legislation, studies showed Roth 401(k) gaining significant traction.  Join McDermott Will & Emery as we demystify the mechanics of Roth 401(k) and help your organization determine whether to adopt or expand a Roth 401(k) feature.  Specific topics will include:

  • Roth 401(k) history and basics
  • Pros and cons of adopting a Roth 401(k) feature
  • Mechanics of in-plan Roth conversions under old and new legislation
  • Interaction of Roth 401(k) with automatic enrollment and safe harbor 401(k) plans

McDermott Speakers
Nancy S. Gerrie, Partner
Diane M. Morgenthaler, Partner
Elizabeth A. Savard, Partner

For more information, please contact Carolyn Verscaj.




read more

BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

Top ranked chambers 2022
US leading firm 2022