Retirement Plans
Subscribe to Retirement Plans's Posts

Second Circuit Narrows ERISA Exhaustion Requirement When Plan Document Is Ambiguous on Need to Follow Claims Procedures

by Michael T. Graham, Elizabeth A. Savard and Patrick D. Ryan

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s holding in Kirkendall v. Halliburton, Inc. reaffirms that a benefit plan’s claims procedures must be drafted clearly and in language to be understood by a reasonable participant.  If participants are permitted to avoid a plan’s administrative claims process, there are significant impacts on a plan’s defense of a lawsuit, including application of a de novo standard of review to a benefit determination rather than the deferential arbitrary and capricious standard.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

IRS Updates Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System

by Lisa K. Loesel, Mary K. Samsa and Kary Crassweller

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently updated the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS), the comprehensive system of correction programs for sponsors of qualified retirement plans.  The components of EPCRS continue to be the Self-Correction Program, the Voluntary Correction Program (VCP) and the Audit Closing Agreement Program.  This newsletter describes some of the significant changes to EPCRS, including revisions to the VCP submission procedures and enhanced access for 403(b) plans.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

New Law Expands “In-Plan” Roth 401(k) Conversions

by Nancy S. Gerrie, Elizabeth A. Savard and Joseph K. Urwitz

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (the “fiscal cliff” bill) allows employers to amend 401(k), 403(b) and governmental 457(b) plans to permit participants to convert pre-tax account balances to Roth account balances.  Previously, such conversions were permitted only when the pre-tax amounts could be distributed.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

IRS Extends Deadline for Defined Benefit Plans to Adopt Code Section 436 Amendments

by Stephen Pavlick, Susan Schaefer and Kary Crassweller

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2012-70, extending the deadline for plan sponsors of defined benefit plans to adopt amendments to comply with Section 436 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code), which generally imposes plan benefit payment and amendment restrictions if a defined benefit plan’s funding dips below specified levels.

Background

Code Section 436 sets forth a series of limitations on the accrual and payment of benefits under an underfunded defined benefit plan (see “New Notice Requirements Effective November 1, 2012 for Single Employer Pension Plans with Funding-Related Restrictions” for more information).  Under previous IRS guidance, (see “IRS Extends Year-End Deadline for Pension Plan Amendments Under Code Section 436” for more information), the deadline for adopting the Code Section 436 amendment to reflect such funding-based restrictions was generally the last day of the plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2012 (e.g., December 31, 2012, for calendar year plans).

New Deadlines

On November 21, the IRS extended the deadline for adopting the required Section 436 amendment to the latest of the following:

  • The last day of the plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2013 (e.g., December 31, 2013, for calendar year plans)
  • The last day of the plan year for which Code Section 436 is first effective for the plan
  • The due date (including extensions) of the employer’s tax return for the tax year that contains the first day of the plan year for which Code Section 436 is first effective for the plan

However, plan sponsors submitting determination letter applications on or after February 1, 2013, for individually designed plans must adopt the Code Section 436 amendment prior to submitting the application.  Determination letter applications that are filed prior to February 1, 2013 (Cycle B plans), do not need to include provisions complying with Code Section 436.

Notice 2012-70 also extends the relief period under the anti-cutback requirements of Code Section 411(d)(6), which generally provide that a tax-qualified defined benefit plan may not be amended to reduce or eliminate a participant’s accrued benefit.

Defined benefit plan sponsors should review the new guidance to determine the proper deadline for Code Section 436 amendments for their plans.  For more information on this guidance, please contact your regular McDermott attorney or one of the listed authors.




read more

PBGC Announces Formal Policy Reducing Impact of ERISA Section 4062(e) on Creditworthy Plan Sponsors

by Michael T. Graham, Stephen Pavlick and Patrick D. Ryan

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) has announced a new pilot program that should substantially modify its enforcement strategy regarding pension liability for facility closures under ERISA Section 4062(e).  Under this new program, PBGC will no longer assess liability against creditworthy companies or small plans, and instead will focus its enforcement efforts on larger companies in questionable financial health.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

Worldwide Employee Benefits Network Chicago Chapter Meeting: Annual Regulatory and Legislative Review

Wednesday, December 5, 2012
7:30 – 9:30 am CST

UBS Tower
One North Wacker Drive, 2nd Floor
Michigan II Ballroom
(Northeast Corner of Wacker & Madison)

To register, please click here.

This year will be remembered as another year of rapid change in employee benefits.  The year-end tasks are plentiful, but if you live in fear of a missed deadline, then let our retirement and welfare experts guide you through the home stretch and assist with your year-end task lists as we review this year’s employee benefits regulatory and legislative developments.

Speakers
Joni Andrioff, Shareholder, Littler Mendelson
Susan Nash, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery




read more

New Notice Requirements Effective November 1, 2012, for Single Employer Pension Plans with Funding-Related Restrictions

by Diane Morgenthaler, Maureen O’Brien and Kary Crassweller

Recently the Internal Revenue Service provided the first set of guidance on the new notice requirements for single employer defined benefit plans subject to funding-related restrictions under Section 436 of the Internal Revenue Code.  This guidance includes information on notice recipients, content, delivery and timing.  Because significant penalties apply to a notice failure, plan sponsors need to carefully review this new guidance.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

IRS Announces Employee Benefit Plan Limits for 2013

by Jeffrey Holdvogt, Diane Morgenthaler and Adrienne Walker Porter

The Internal Revenue Service recently announced cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) to the applicable dollar limits on various employer-sponsored retirement and welfare plans for 2013.  Although many dollar limits currently in effect for 2012 will change, some limits will remain unchanged for 2013.  McDermott Will & Emery has prepared a chart of these 2013 COLA changes.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

IRS Eliminates Use of Letter Forwarding Service to Find Missing Participants and Beneficiaries

by Jeffrey M. Holdvogt and Susan Peters Schaefer

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently discontinued its letter forwarding service for missing participants or beneficiaries entitled to a benefit under an employee retirement plan.  Until now, retirement plan sponsors have frequently used the IRS letter forwarding service as a way to locate missing participants or beneficiaries to whom benefits are owed under a retirement plan.  Following this discontinuance, plan sponsors will need to utilize another more expensive government forwarding service or utilize internet search tools, commercial locater services and credit report agencies to locate missing retirement plan participants.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

E&P and Deduction Opportunities for U.S. Companies with Foreign Pension Plans

by David G. Noren and Ruth Wimer

It has now been 30 years since the U.S. Congress enacted Section 404A to “rescue” U.S. taxpayers with global operations maintaining large foreign pension plans through branches, disregarded entities, partnerships or controlled foreign corporations.  Section 404A was intended to allow a deduction or a reduction in earnings and profits (E&P) as applicable, in a manner that would mirror what would apply had the foreign pension plan instead been a U.S.-qualified pension plan under Section 401(a).  However, without an affirmative election by the U.S. taxpayer under Section 404A, in most instances the deduction or reduction in E&P is seriously compromised.

To read the full article, click here.




read more

BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

Top ranked chambers 2022
US leading firm 2022