Employment Archives - Page 33 of 104 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS BLOG

German Employment Law Update | Holidays Without Borders? European Court of Justice Rules That Workers Cannot Automatically Lose Holiday Entitlement

by Dr. Gudrun Germakowski, Dr. Sandra Urban-Crell, Dr. Thomas Gennert and Volker Teigelkötter | Dec 13, 2018 | Employment

On November 6, 2018 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) passed judgment on two German cases (Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften eV v Shimizu [C-684/16] and Kreuziger v Land Berlin [C-619/16]) concerning untaken paid annual leave entitlement. The ECJ ruled that accrued annual leave entitlements cannot be automatically forfeited if the worker does not place a request for holiday, and also applies to compensation claims at the termination of employment. These entitlements only cease if the employer has given workers ample opportunity to take the leave in question on time.

Access the full article in German here.

#MeToo Movement Implications on Employment Agreements

by Evan A. Belosa | Dec 6, 2018 | Employee Benefits, Employment, Executive Compensation

Given the rise of the #MeToo movement, companies are having to deal with many issues when drafting employee agreement contracts. In a presentation, Evan Belosa discussed these issues, including triggering events, nondisclosure agreements and restrictive covenant changes. He also addressed latest trends in state and local law affecting hiring and management of the workforce.

View the full presentation.

Making a Splash in the Global Employment Pool: The Challenge of Multiple Employment Laws

by Marjorie C. Soto Garcia and Michelle S. Strowhiro | Sep 18, 2018 | Employment

US businesses expanding abroad, and international businesses moving into the United States, can find the differences between employment laws both unexpected and costly.

Companies of all sizes are eager to expand their businesses, and their workforce, into new markets. US employers already know that operating in multiple states can feel like operating in different countries because of state- and locality-specific employment laws. But if operating in California versus Wyoming is comparing pools to puddles, then operating in the United States versus other countries is comparing puddles to oceans.

US-based companies looking to expand abroad, and foreign companies opening their first US locations, must proceed with caution before jumping in. One error can commit a business to employing its workforce until retirement, cost months and a small fortune to terminate the employment relationship, or keep it embroiled for years in class action litigation.

Access the full article.

The Forgotten “T” in LGBT: Best Practices for Creating a Transgender-Inclusive Workplace

by Todd Solomon | Sep 11, 2018 | Employee Benefits, Employment

Creating a gender identity and/or expression inclusive workplace allows employers to attract and retain talented employees, boosts engagement and productivity, and mitigates risks of legal claims. In a presentation at the 37th Annual ISCEBS Employee Benefit Symposium, Todd Solomon creates a business case for transgender inclusion by exploring legal trends. He discusses best practices for workplace policies, such as introducing transgender employee benefits. Todd also provides practical steps for cultivating an inclusive work culture.

View the full presentation.

Webinar | Non-Compete Reform Comes to the Commonwealth

by Anthony A. Bongiorno, Andrew Liazos, Evan A. Belosa and Rachel B. Cowen | Sep 5, 2018 | Employee Benefits, Employment, Executive Compensation

Join us on Thursday, September 6 at 1:00 PM EDT for a webinar designed to address questions around the Massachusetts Noncompetition Agreement Act (the Act), signed into law by Governor Baker on Friday, August 10. The Act, which takes effect on October 1, requires all employers doing business in Massachusetts to change the way they establish and structure noncompetition agreements and related forfeiture provisions under compensation arrangements.

Our panel of lawyers focused on litigation, employment and employee benefits law from Massachusetts and other states, will discuss key aspects of this legislation, strategies and best practices. Questions that will be addressed by the panel include:

What changes should be made to support noncompetition agreements going forward?
How can a noncompetition agreement be used in connection with providing severance benefits?
What is the status for existing non-competition agreements? When is grandfathering available?
Are there other available types of agreements that can adequately protect employers’ interests?
Might ERISA preempt the new Massachusetts noncompetition law as related to benefit plans?
How will the changes to Massachusetts law impact corporate transactions?
How will the changes in Massachusetts law affect restrictive covenant litigation in Massachusetts courts?
What approaches to address the Massachusetts changes will make sense for multi-state employers?

Register now.

New Restrictions on Using Non-Competes in Massachusetts – What You Need to Know

by Anthony A. Bongiorno, Andrew Liazos, Evan A. Belosa and Rachel B. Cowen | Aug 14, 2018 | Employment, Executive Compensation

The Massachusetts legislature’s recent approval of a comprehensive non-competition reform bill includes significant restrictions for employers seeking to impose non-compete obligations on Massachusetts workers. The Massachusetts Noncompetition Agreement Act will become effective on October 1, 2018, leaving little time for employers to consider what actions to take to protect their business interests.

Access the full article.

4 Things to Watch After the High Court’s Body Blow to Labor

by P. Kevin Connelly | Jul 26, 2018 | Employment, Labor

Kevin Connelly said unions will face an adjustment period as they seek to implement more creative methods of trying to retain dues-paying members. “I wouldn’t underestimate the unions. If someone wants to say this is the end of the day for public-sector unions—nope, not true,” he said. “There will be consequences, but I think the unions that operate in that sector will be clever enough to make the appropriate adjustments.”

Access the full article.

Originally published by Law360, June 2018.

Salary Payment in Tokens: German Labour Law Considerations

by Dr. Oliver Lieth, Dr. Sebastian Keding, Dr. Thomas Gennert and Volker Teigelkötter | Jul 10, 2018 | Employment

More companies are considering paying their employees in tokens such as Bitcoin. The Japanese GMO group and the German Digitalmagazin t3n, for example, have announced that they plan to pay their employees in Bitcoin. This trend gives rise to the question: Are there restrictions under German employment law that companies must take into account?

Access the full article.

Transgender Employees and Employment Discrimination

by Alison L. Nadel and Natalie Colvin | Jun 28, 2018 | Employment

Alison Nadel and Natalie Colvin wrote this bylined article about considerations for employers around gender identity and expression under Title VII.

Access the full article.

Dynamex: Stricter Definition of Independent Contractors Brings New Challenges for California Employers

by P. Kevin Connelly and McDermott Will & Emery | Jun 19, 2018 | Employment

Ron Holland, Ellen Bronchetti and Kevin Connelly presented on challenges California employers face in light of a stricter definition for independent contractors. They discuss the Dynamex presumption which places the burden on the hiring entity to establish that the worker is an independent contractor who was not intended to be included within the wage order’s coverage.

View the full presentation.

BLOG EDITORS

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

RECENT POSTS